Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022 ; 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2325325

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 has been detected both in air and on surfaces, but questions remain about the patient-specific and environmental factors affecting virus transmission to the environment. Additionally, more detailed information on viral findings in the air is needed. In this cross-sectional study, we present results from 259 air and 252 surface samples from the surroundings of 23 hospitalized and eight home-treated COVID-19 patients between July 2020 and March 2021 and compare the results between the measured environments and patient factors. In four cases, positive environmental samples were detected even after the patients had developed a neutralizing IgG response. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in multiple particle sizes and different air samplers. Appropriate infection control against airborne and surface transmission routes is needed in both environments, even after antibody production has begun. © 2022 17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022. All rights reserved.

2.
IET Nanobiotechnol ; 17(4): 289-301, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299400

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of COVID-19 disease, the cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome, is considered a worldwide public health concern. Although studies indicated that the virus could spread through respiratory particles or droplets in close contact, current research have revealed that the virus stays viable in aerosols for several hours. Numerous investigations have highlighted the protective role of air purifiers in the management of COVID-19 transmission, however, there are still some doubts regarding the efficiency and safety of these technologies. According to those observations, using a proper ventilation system can extensively decrease the spread of COVID-19. However, most of those strategies are currently in the experimental stages. This review aimed at summarising the safety and effectiveness of the recent approaches in this field including using nanofibres that prevent the spread of airborne viruses like SARS-CoV-2. Here, the efficacy of controlling COVID-19 by means of combining multiple strategies is comprehensively discussed.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , Nanotechnology
3.
Molecules ; 28(8)2023 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304471

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess the markers of chemical and microbiological contamination of the air at sport centers (e.g., the fitness center in Poland) including the determination of particulate matter, CO2, formaldehyde (DustTrak™ DRX Aerosol Monitor; Multi-functional Air Quality Detector), volatile organic compound (VOC) concentration (headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry), the number of microorganisms in the air (culture methods), and microbial biodiversity (high-throughput sequencing on the Illumina platform). Additionally the number of microorganisms and the presence of SARS-CoV-2 (PCR) on the surfaces was determined. Total particle concentration varied between 0.0445 mg m-3 and 0.0841 mg m-3 with the dominance (99.65-99.99%) of the PM2.5 fraction. The CO2 concentration ranged from 800 ppm to 2198 ppm, while the formaldehyde concentration was from 0.005 mg/m3 to 0.049 mg m-3. A total of 84 VOCs were identified in the air collected from the gym. Phenol, D-limonene, toluene, and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol dominated in the air at the tested facilities. The average daily number of bacteria was 7.17 × 102 CFU m-3-1.68 × 103 CFU m-3, while the number of fungi was 3.03 × 103 CFU m-3-7.34 × 103 CFU m-3. In total, 422 genera of bacteria and 408 genera of fungi representing 21 and 11 phyla, respectively, were detected in the gym. The most abundant bacteria and fungi (>1%) that belonged to the second and third groups of health hazards were: Escherichia-Shigella, Corynebacterium, Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium. In addition, other species that may be allergenic (Epicoccum) or infectious (Acinetobacter, Sphingomonas, Sporobolomyces) were present in the air. Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected on surfaces in the gym. The monitoring proposal for the assessment of the air quality at a sport center includes the following markers: total particle concentration with the PM2.5 fraction, CO2 concentration, VOCs (phenol, toluene, and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol), and the number of bacteria and fungi.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , COVID-19 , Mitosporic Fungi , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Air Microbiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , Fungi , Bacteria , Particulate Matter/analysis , Phenols/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Environmental Monitoring
4.
Journal of Building Engineering ; 69, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2277223

ABSTRACT

Densely occupied spaces (e.g., classrooms) are generally over-crowded and pose a high risk of cross-infection during the pandemic of COVID-19. Among various ventilation systems, impinging jet ventilation (IJV) system might be promising for such spaces. However, the exhaust location of the IJV system used for densely occupied classrooms is unclear. This study aims to investigate the effects of exhaust location on the removal of exhaled contaminants in a classroom (15 × 7 × 5 m3) occupied by 50 students. Exhaled contaminants are modeled by a tracer gas released at the top of each manikin. The reference case has three exhausts evenly distributed in the ceiling. The results indicate that: a) a recirculation airflow entraining exhaled contaminants exists above the occupied zone;b) this recirculation air flow entrains contaminants and accumulates them at the upper part of the room near the diffuser;c) locating merely one exhaust on the same side of the supply diffuser leads to the best indoor air quality, i.e., it reduces the mean age of air from 278 s to 243 s, the mass fraction of CO2 from 753 ppm to 726 ppm, and the concentration of tracer gas from 305 ppm to 266 ppm;d) this layout still performs the best when the supply velocity drops to 0.5 m/s. It is worth noting that the proposed layout has fewer exhausts than the reference case but performs better. These results conclude that the exhaust for large spaces is not evenly distributed but depends on the indoor airflow pattern: the key is locating the exhaust near the region with high contaminant concentration. Factors determining the recirculation airflow are suggested to be further studied. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

5.
J Hosp Infect ; 2022 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surfaces and air in healthcare facilities can be contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. In a previous study, we identified SARS-CoV-2 RNA on surfaces and air in our hospital during the 'first wave' of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020). AIM: To explore whether the profile of SARS-CoV-2 surface and air contamination had changed between April 2020 and January 2021. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study in a multisite London hospital. In January 2021, surface and air samples were collected from comparable areas to those sampled in April 2020 comprising six clinical areas and a public area. SARS-CoV-2 was detected using RT-PCR and viral culture. Sampling was additionally undertaken in two wards with only natural ventilation. The ability of the prevalent variants at the time of the study to survive on dry surfaces was evaluated. FINDINGS: No viable virus was recovered from surfaces or air. 5% (14) of 270 surfaces and 4% (1) of 27 air samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2, which was significantly lower than in April 2020 (52% (114) of 218 of surfaces and 48% (13) of 27 air samples (p<0.001, Fisher's Exact Test)). There was no clear difference in the proportion of surfaces and air samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA based on the type of ventilation in the ward. All variants tested survived on dry surfaces for at least 72 hours with a <3-log10 reduction in viable count. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that enhanced infection prevention measures have reduced the burden of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on surfaces and air in healthcare.

6.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(3)2023 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2225189

ABSTRACT

The risk of microbial air contamination in a dental setting, especially during aerosol-generating dental procedures (AGDPs), has long been recognized, becoming even more relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, individual pathogens were rarely studied, and microbial loads were measured heterogeneously, often using low-sensitivity methods. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess microbial air contamination in the dental environment, identify the microorganisms involved, and determine their count by active air sampling at the beginning (T0), during (T1), and at the end (T2) of ultrasonic scaling in systemically and periodontally healthy subjects. Air microbial contamination was detected at T0 in all samples, regardless of whether the sample was collected from patients treated first or later; predominantly Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus and Bacillus spp. and a minority of fungi, were identified. The number of bacterial colonies at T1 was higher, although the species found were similar to that found during the T0 sampling, whereby Gram-positive bacteria, mainly Streptococcus spp., were identified. Air samples collected at T2 showed a decrease in bacterial load compared to the previous sampling. Further research should investigate the levels and patterns of the microbial contamination of air, people, and the environment in dental settings via ultrasonic scaling and other AGDPs and identify the microorganisms involved to perform the procedure- and patient-related risk assessment and provide appropriate recommendations for aerosol infection control.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ultrasonics , Humans , Healthy Volunteers , Pandemics , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , Air Microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial
7.
Atmosphere ; 13(5):800, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1871824

ABSTRACT

Aims: With the ongoing pandemic and increased interest in measures to improve indoor air quality, various indoor air purifiers have become very popular and are widely used. This review presents the advantages and disadvantages of various types of technologies used in air purifiers in terms of reducing microbial contamination. Methods: A literature search was performed using Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, as well as technical organizations dealing with indoor air-quality to identify research articles and documents within our defined scope of interest. Relevant sections: The available literature data focus mainly on the efficiency of devices based on tests conducted in laboratory conditions with test chambers, which does not reflect the real dimensions and conditions observed in residential areas. According to a wide range of articles on the topic, the actual effectiveness of air purifiers is significantly lower in real conditions than the values declared by the manufacturers in their marketing materials as well as technical specifications. Conclusions: According to current findings, using indoor air purifiers should not be the only measure to improve indoor air-quality;however, these can play a supporting role if their application is preceded by an appropriate technical and environmental analysis considering the real conditions of its use.

8.
Build Environ ; 219: 109176, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1850736

ABSTRACT

The pandemic of COVID-19 currently shadows the world; the whole earth has been on an unprecedented lockdown. Social distancing among people interrupted domestic and international air traffic, suspended industrial productions and economic activities, and had various far-reaching and undetermined implications on air quality. Improvement in air quality has been reported in many cities during the lockdown. On March 22, 2020, the Turkish government enforced strict lockdown measures to reduce coronavirus disease transmission. This lockdown had a significant impact on the movement of people within the country, which resulted in a major drop in worldwide commercial activities. During this period, university campuses were emptied due to the transition to distance education. In this study, various air pollutants sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), total bacteria, and total fungi were measured in different indoor environments at Eskisehir Technical University Campus in Eskisehir, Turkey during COVID-19 lock down period. Also, to calculate the indoor and outdoor ratios (I/O) of the pollutants, simultaneous outdoor measurements were also carried out. The average indoor SO2, NO2, O3, and PM2.5 concentrations in different indoor environments ranged between 2.10 and 54.58, 1.36-30.89, 12.01-39.05, and 21-94 µg/m3, respectively. The total number of bacteria and fungi ranged between 21.83-514.15 and 13.10-83.36 CFU/m3, respectively. Our study intends to give a glimpse to quantify the impact of a pandemic on air quality in different indoor environments in a university campus in Eskisehir, Turkey and calls for follow-up studies. Indoor concentrations were evaluated together with outdoor concentrations. In general, it can be said that the calculated I/O ratios for SO2, NO2, O3, bacteria, and fungi were less than 1 in most indoor environments.

9.
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management ; 29(4):1609-1641, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1779034

ABSTRACT

Purpose>Biocontaminants represent higher risks to occupants' health in shared spaces. Natural ventilation is an effective strategy against indoor air biocontamination. However, the relationship between natural ventilation and indoor air contamination requires an in-depth investigation of the behavior of airborne infectious diseases, particularly concerning the contaminant's viral and aerodynamic characteristics. This research investigates the effectiveness of natural ventilation in preventing infection risks for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) through indoor air contamination of a free-running, naturally-ventilated room (where no space conditioning is used) that contains a person having COVID-19 through building-related parameters.Design/methodology/approach>This research adopts a case study strategy involving a simulation-based approach. A simulation pipeline is implemented through a number of design scenarios for an open office. The simulation pipeline performs integrated contamination analysis, coupling a parametric 3D design environment, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and energy simulations. The results of the implemented pipeline for COVID-19 are evaluated for building and environment-related parameters. Study metrics are identified as indoor air contamination levels, discharge period and the time of infection.Findings>According to the simulation results, higher indoor air temperatures help to reduce the infection risk. Free-running spring and fall seasons can pose higher infection risk as compared to summer. Higher opening-to-wall ratios have higher potential to reduce infection risk. Adjacent window configuration has an advantage over opposite window configuration. As a design strategy, increasing opening-to-wall ratio has a higher impact on reducing the infection risk as compared to changing the opening configuration from opposite to adjacent. However, each building setup is a unique case that requires a systematic investigation to reliably understand the complex airflow and contaminant dispersion behavior. Metrics, strategies and actions to minimize indoor contamination risks should be addressed in future building standards. The simulation pipeline developed in this study has the potential to support decision-making during the adaptation of existing buildings to pandemic conditions and the design of new buildings.Originality/value>The addressed need of investigation is especially crucial for the COVID-19 that is contagious and hazardous in shared indoors due to its aerodynamic behavior, faster transmission rates and high viral replicability. This research contributes to the current literature by presenting the simulation-based results for COVID-19 as investigated through building-related and environment-related parameters against contaminant concentration levels, the discharge period and the time of infection. Accordingly, this research presents results to provide a basis for a broader understanding of the correlation between the built environment and the aerodynamic behavior of COVID-19.

10.
J Hosp Infect ; 122: 173-179, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1729910

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An unprecedented rise in the number of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) cases has been reported in India. Myriad hypotheses are proposed for the outbreak. We recently reported uncontrolled diabetes and inappropriate steroid therapy as significant risk factors for the outbreak. However, Mucorales contamination of hospital environment was not studied. AIM: To perform a multi-centre study across India to determine possible Mucorales contamination of hospital environment during the outbreak. METHODS: Eleven hospitals from four zones of India representing high to low incidence for mucormycosis cases were included in the study. Samples from a variety of equipment used by the patients and ambient air were collected during May 19th, 2021 through August 25th, 2021. FINDINGS: None of the hospital equipment sampled was contaminated with Mucorales. However, Mucorales were isolated from 11.1% air-conditioning vents and 1.7% of patients' used masks. Other fungi were isolated from 18% of hospital equipment and surfaces, and 8.1% of used masks. Mucorales grew from 21.7% indoor and 53.8% outdoor air samples. Spore counts of Mucorales in air were significantly higher in the hospitals of North and South zones compared to West and East zones (P < 0.0001). Among Mucorales isolated from the environment, Rhizopus spp. were the most frequent genus. CONCLUSION: Contamination of air-conditioning vents and hospital air by Mucorales was found. Presence of Mucorales in these areas demands regular surveillance and improvement of hospital environment, as contamination may contribute to healthcare-associated mucormycosis outbreaks, especially among immunocompromised patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mucorales , Mucormycosis , Disease Outbreaks , Hospitals , Humans , India/epidemiology , Mucormycosis/epidemiology
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): e1870-e1877, 2021 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1455249

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surface and air contamination during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in London. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study in a multisite London hospital. Air and surface samples were collected from 7 clinical areas occupied by patients with COVID-19 and a public area of the hospital. Three or four 1.0-m3 air samples were collected in each area using an active air sampler. Surface samples were collected by swabbing items in the immediate vicinity of each air sample. SARS-CoV-2 was detected using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viral culture; the limit of detection for culturing SARS-CoV-2 from surfaces was determined. RESULTS: Viral RNA was detected on 114 of 218 (52.3%) surfaces and in 14 of 31 (38.7%) air samples, but no virus was cultured. Viral RNA was more likely to be found in areas immediately occupied by COVID-19 patients than in other areas (67 of 105 [63.8%] vs 29 of 64 [45.3%]; odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.9; P = .025, χ2 test). The high PCR cycle threshold value for all samples (>30) indicated that the virus would not be culturable. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of extensive viral RNA contamination of surfaces and air across a range of acute healthcare settings in the absence of cultured virus underlines the potential risk from environmental contamination in managing COVID-19 and the need for effective use of personal protective equipment, physical distancing, and hand/surface hygiene.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , London/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prospective Studies
12.
Cureus ; 13(3): e13769, 2021 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1168102

ABSTRACT

Some patients may need mechanical ventilation support during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (coronavirus disease-2019, COVID-19) infection and may eventually require tracheostomy in the following days. Tracheostomy is considered as a high-risk procedure for surgeons and operative personnel in terms of air contamination. We present a case of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy performed in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia and the methods we used to reduce contamination risks for the healthcare staff.

13.
J Hosp Infect ; 110: 97-102, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1051768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are a global patient safety concern. Due to lack of evidence on contamination, pre-set surgical goods are sometimes disposed of or re-sterilized, thus increasing costs, resource use, and environmental effects. AIM: To investigate time-dependent bacterial air contamination of covered and uncovered sterile goods in the operating room. METHODS: Blood agar plates (N = 1584) were used to detect bacterial air contamination of sterile fields on 48 occasions. Each time, three aerobe and three anaerobe plates were used as baseline to model the preparation time, and 60 (30 aerobe, 30 anaerobe) were used to model the time pending before operation; half of these were covered with sterile drapes and half remained uncovered. Plates were collected after 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h. FINDINGS: Mean time before contamination was 2.8 h (95% confidence interval: 2.1-3.4) in the uncovered group and 3.8 h (3.2-4.4) in the covered group (P = 0.005). The uncovered group had 98 colony-forming units (cfu) versus 20 in the covered group (P = 0.0001). Sixteen different micro-organisms were isolated, the most common being Cutibacterium acnes followed by Micrococcus luteus. Of 32 Staphylococcus cfu, 14 were antibiotic resistant, including one multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. CONCLUSION: Protecting sterile fields from bacterial air contamination with sterile covers enhances the durability of sterile goods up to 24 h. Prolonged durability of sterile goods might benefit patient safety, since surgical sterile material could be prepared in advance for acute surgery, thereby enhancing quality of care and reducing both climate impact and costs.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Operating Rooms , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Micrococcus luteus/isolation & purification , Propionibacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL